Background
Arteriovenous loops (AVL) provide high flow, low resistance, large caliber vessels from out site of the zone of injury and are a useful adjunct for reconstruction of vessel deplete defects1. Single and two stage techniques are described in the literature2. We aim to compare single versus two stage AVL techniques with a case presentation and literature review.
Methods
We present a case of single-stage AVL for reconstruction of defect overlying total knee reconstruction with exposed metal, followed by literature review.
Discussion
AVL have a higher rate of complications compared to primary anastomosis1. Case series have shown equal success rate with both single and two stage techniques, with some studies suggesting completion of the second stage within ten days to reduce thrombosis rates2. However, a recent meta-analysis found that single stage techniques have a statistically significant lower rate of complications3.
Increased rates of thrombosis with anterolateral thigh free flaps compared to other free flaps have also been shown2.
Conclusions
Single stage AVL are the preferred technique when an AVL is required for successful free flap reconstruction. However, both techniques can provide distant vessels for free flap anastomosis when there is a paucity of local recipient vessels.